Most of the evidence cited in the 9/11 inside-job case is not secret. It is on the Congressional record, in released FOIA documents, in court transcripts from the In re Terrorist Attacks civil suit in the Southern District of New York, in the FBI's 2021 Operation Encore declassification, and in television footage that aired live. What is contested is not whether these pieces of evidence exist, but what pattern they form when assembled. Twenty-five years later, the assembly work continues — and the active work has shifted from early-era polemics to slower-moving document review of primary sources that were classified for two decades and have only recently been released.

Where it started

On the morning of September 11, 2001, four US commercial aircraft were hijacked. American Airlines Flight 11 struck the North Tower of the World Trade Center at 8:46 AM. United Airlines Flight 175 struck the South Tower at 9:03 AM. American Airlines Flight 77 struck the Pentagon at 9:37 AM. United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania at 10:03 AM. The South Tower collapsed at 9:59 AM; the North Tower at 10:28 AM. A third building — World Trade Center 7, also known as the Salomon Brothers Building, a 47-story office tower that was not hit by any aircraft — collapsed at 5:20 PM. The official death toll across all sites was 2,977 victims in addition to the 19 hijackers.

The 19 hijackers, as identified by the 9/11 Commission, were 15 Saudi nationals (including Mohamed Atta, Hani Hanjour, Nawaf al-Hazmi, and Hamza al-Ghamdi), two United Arab Emirates nationals, one Egyptian (Atta), and one Lebanese (Ziad Jarrah). Operational planning was attributed to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed — captured in Rawalpindi, Pakistan on March 1, 2003 and held at Guantanamo Bay since 2006, with military commission proceedings ongoing and paused repeatedly since 2012. Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called "20th hijacker," was arrested in Minnesota on August 16, 2001 and is serving a life sentence at ADX Florence. The central authorship was attributed to al-Qaeda under Osama bin Laden, who was killed in Abbottabad, Pakistan by US Navy SEALs on May 2, 2011.

The official account was produced by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (the 9/11 Commission, co-chaired by Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, operating 2002–2004; final report July 22, 2004), with subsequent technical investigations by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) — NCSTAR 1 on the Twin Towers (September 2005) and NCSTAR 1A on WTC 7 (August 2008). The inside-job framing has been advanced by multiple overlapping groups: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth, founded in 2006 by architect Richard Gage, now comprising more than 3,500 architecture and engineering signatories), the 9/11 Family Steering Committee's surviving members, and a large body of independent researchers. The framing is not one unified theory but a cluster of documented questions that researchers argue the official investigation inadequately addressed.

What the theory claims

The inside-job framing does not converge on a single actor. Its specific framings are genuinely distinct from one another, and researchers within one framing will sometimes reject the others.

LIHOP (Let It Happen On Purpose). The most widely held version. Elements of the US government had advance warning of the attacks and allowed them to proceed. Citations include the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Brief titled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US" (declassified April 2004); multiple FBI and CIA whistleblower accounts including those of Sibel Edmonds (FBI translator, gagged under state secrets privilege), Colleen Rowley (Minneapolis FBI, Moussaoui warning), and Kenneth Williams (Phoenix FBI, 2001 memo regarding Middle Eastern students at flight schools); and pre-attack financial anomalies including unusual put-options activity on United Airlines and American Airlines stock in the days before September 11, which the 9/11 Commission investigated and which independent researchers argue was not fully resolved.

MIHOP (Made It Happen On Purpose). Elements of the US government actively orchestrated the attacks through facilitation, explosive planting, or drone substitution for the aircraft. Citations focus on Building 7 collapse characteristics, the Pentagon strike geometry (including taxi driver Lloyde England's Pentagon light-pole witness account and the question of how the Boeing 757's wings interacted with the building's reinforced columns), and the pre-attack positioning of key figures. Barbara Honegger's The Pentagon Attack Papers and the work of Dr. Judy Wood (Where Did the Towers Go?, 2010) — which advances a directed-energy-weapon (DEW) hypothesis — sit within the MIHOP framing, though they are also contested within 9/11 research itself.

Allied-state framing. Intelligence services of allied states — most commonly Saudi Arabia and/or Israel — had advance knowledge or operational involvement. Citations include the Dancing Israelis incident, the Odigo warnings, the 28 pages redacted from the Congressional Joint Inquiry (released July 15, 2016, detailing Saudi government connections to the hijackers and providing the basis for subsequent JASTA legislation), the FBI's Operation Encore sub-investigation declassified beginning September 11, 2021, and the Netanyahu 2008 recording. The allied-state framing has been given substantial additional weight by the 2016–2026 period's document releases and by the ongoing In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 civil litigation in the Southern District of New York.

Controlled demolition framing. One or more of the WTC buildings were brought down by pre-placed explosives rather than by aircraft impacts and fires alone. Citations include the FDNY oral histories, the Building 7 free-fall finding (NIST acknowledged 2.25 seconds of free-fall acceleration in the draft report, which independent researchers argued is inconsistent with the fire-driven collapse model), molten-steel observations in the post-collapse debris, the Harrit et al. 2009 paper in the Open Chemical Physics Journal identifying unreacted and partially reacted nanothermitic material in WTC dust samples, and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth's structural analysis. The 2020 University of Alaska Fairbanks Hulsey study is the most recent academic contribution to this framing.

The variations

Within the 9/11 research community, the LIHOP and allied-state framings are the most widely held. The controlled-demolition framing, focused specifically on Building 7, is held by a substantial subset including nearly all AE911Truth signatories. A smaller subset extends the controlled-demolition argument to the Twin Towers, citing the FDNY oral histories, the Harrit nanothermite paper, and molten-steel observations. The hardest variations — drone substitution, hologram theories, no-plane-at-Pentagon — are held by a minority and are disputed within 9/11 research itself. What the variations share is the argument that the 9/11 Commission Report represents an incomplete — possibly deliberately incomplete — account. The Commission's own chair and vice-chair, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, stated in their 2006 joint book Without Precedent that they believed they had been lied to by NORAD and by the FAA during the investigation. Commissioner Max Cleland (former US Senator from Georgia) resigned from the Commission in December 2003, publicly citing the administration's refusal to grant access to key documents; Cleland later described the Commission as "scammed."

What researchers point to

Documented · the lease and insurance

Larry Silverstein signed the 99-year net lease for the World Trade Center on July 24, 2001 — 48 days before the September 11 attacks — for $3.2 billion. The lease included $3.55 billion in terrorism coverage per occurrence. Silverstein successfully argued in court that the two plane impacts constituted two separate events; in 2007 he was awarded a $4.55 billion insurance settlement, the largest in US history at that time. The towers had substantial known asbestos contamination — approximately 400 tons of spray-on fireproofing — whose legally mandated removal was estimated at over $1 billion. Silverstein was not in the buildings on the morning of 9/11 due to a dermatology appointment his wife had scheduled; his adult children Lisa and Roger were also reportedly absent. He typically ate breakfast at the Windows on the World restaurant on the 107th floor of the North Tower.

Documented · "pull it" and Jowenko

In the September 2002 PBS documentary America Rebuilds, Silverstein said of Building 7: "I remember getting a call from the, uh, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." Silverstein has clarified he meant "pull the firefighters." Dutch controlled-demolition expert Danny Jowenko — CEO of Jowenko Explosieve Demolitie — was interviewed in 2007 for the Dutch documentary series Zembla and stated on camera, without having been told the building had collapsed on 9/11: "This is a controlled demolition... a team of experts did this." When told of the date, he remained on the record. Jowenko reiterated the claim in multiple subsequent interviews. He died in a single-car accident in the Netherlands on July 16, 2011.

Documented · the BBC early report

At approximately 4:57 PM Eastern Time on September 11, 2001 — 23 minutes before WTC 7 actually collapsed — BBC World reporter Jane Standley reported on air that the Salomon Brothers Building (WTC 7) had collapsed. Footage of the broadcast shows WTC 7 clearly standing behind her. The BBC has acknowledged the early report, attributed it to newsroom confusion in the fast-moving environment, and acknowledged that the original broadcast master tape was subsequently lost. The remaining footage was preserved from off-air recordings and remains the single most-cited visual piece of evidence in Building 7 research. A comparable early report — the CNN broadcast of Aaron Brown describing WTC 7 "collapsing or it has collapsed" roughly an hour before the actual collapse — has received less attention but follows the same pattern.

Documented · the FDNY oral histories

In August 2005, following a multi-year lawsuit by the New York Times and 9/11 families, the City of New York released approximately 12,000 pages of oral-history interviews with 503 FDNY firefighters, paramedics, and personnel, conducted in late 2001 and early 2002 under the direction of then-Commissioner Thomas Von Essen. Multiple testimonies describe explosions, secondary blasts, and sounds consistent with demolition. FDNY firefighter Louie Cacchioli: "I think there were bombs set in the building." EMT Patricia Ondrovic: "I started running... there was a very loud explosion." Chief Frank Cruthers, Firefighter Kenny Rogers, Firefighter Stephen Gregory, Firefighter Christopher Fenyo, and dozens of others describe similar observations. The full archive is publicly searchable via nytimes.com's WTC histories page.

Documented · the Dancing Israelis

On the afternoon of September 11, 2001, five Israeli men — employees of Urban Moving Systems, a New Jersey company owned by Dominik Suter — were arrested after being seen by New Jersey resident Maria Acosta filming and celebrating the WTC attacks from the parking lot of the Doric Towers apartment building in Union City. A white van was later stopped; bomb-sniffing dogs reportedly alerted. A 2002 article in the Forward cited a former government official describing the FBI's assessment that Urban Moving Systems was a Mossad front. Suter fled to Israel. The five — identified by multiple independent-research records as Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner, and Omer Marmari — were detained approximately two months and deported to Israel without criminal charges. They subsequently appeared on Israeli TV; one said: "Our purpose was to document the event." The FBI's official post-investigation position was that the men had no advance knowledge. Congressional pressure reportedly influenced their release.

Documented · Operation Encore and the 28 pages

In July 2016, the previously classified 28 pages of the Congressional Joint Inquiry into 9/11 (completed in December 2002) were released, detailing Saudi government connections to the hijackers including a network of financial and logistical support in San Diego. In September 2016, Congress passed the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA), overriding President Obama's veto, allowing US citizens to sue foreign governments for terrorism. Under Executive Order 14040 signed by President Biden on September 3, 2021, the FBI declassified the first documents from its Operation Encore sub-investigation — a 2007–2016 probe into Saudi government involvement in 9/11 that focused on Saudi intelligence officer Omar al-Bayoumi (who provided substantial assistance to hijackers Nawaf al-Hazmi and Hani Hanjour in San Diego 1999–2000), Saudi consular official Fahad al-Thumairy, and Osama Bassnan. Prince Bandar bin Sultan ("Bandar Bush") — Saudi Ambassador to the US 1983–2005 — was named in financial-flow analyses. The ongoing civil case In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 in the Southern District of New York has produced continued discovery through 2024–2026.

Documented · the Hulsey study

In March 2020, the University of Alaska Fairbanks Civil and Environmental Engineering department published the final report of a four-year study led by Professor Leroy Hulsey titled A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7. The study used finite element modeling — including NASTRAN, ANSYS, and SAP2000 simulations — to test multiple collapse scenarios. The report's stated conclusion: "Fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse." The report specified that the observed collapse required near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building — a condition inconsistent with fire-driven collapse but consistent with controlled demolition. The study was peer-reviewed, funded by AE911Truth and the 9/11 families' organizations, and has not been formally responded to by NIST. The 2020 Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry submitted a formal petition to the US Attorney's office demanding a grand jury investigation; no grand jury has been convened.

Documented · the Harrit nanothermite paper

In April 2009, the Open Chemical Physics Journal published "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" by Niels H. Harrit (University of Copenhagen), Jeffrey Farrer (Brigham Young University), Steven E. Jones (former BYU physics professor), and co-authors. The paper identified red-gray chips in four independently collected WTC dust samples that the authors characterized as unreacted nanothermite — a high-energy-density pyrotechnic composite of aluminum and iron-oxide nanoparticles used in military applications. The paper's publication was accompanied by the journal editor-in-chief's resignation; the journal itself was later absorbed by its publisher Bentham Open. Mainstream critics have argued the samples were contaminated or misidentified; the paper's authors maintain the results. Steven E. Jones — who had also published on the thermite hypothesis in the 2006 paper "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?" — lost his academic position at BYU following his 9/11 research.

Documented · the Netanyahu quote

In a 2008 recorded conversation with settlers in the West Bank, Israeli politician Benjamin Netanyahu was captured on video saying: "We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq." He continued that the attacks had "swung American public opinion in our favor." The recording was released in 2010. The video is authentic; Netanyahu has not disputed its contents. Interpretations range from cynical political commentary on geopolitical side-effects to direct implication of advance-benefit knowledge. The broader "Israel Lobby" framework articulated by Mearsheimer and Walt (2007) is sometimes cited as context for interpreting the Netanyahu statement; whether the quote should be read as strategic commentary or as something more is the contested interpretive question.

RESEARCHING THIS?

Save the primary footage before it's removed again.

The BBC WTC 7 early-report footage, the Silverstein "pull it" clip, the Danny Jowenko Zembla interview, the Dancing Israelis Israeli TV segment, the FDNY oral-history video readings, and the Loose Change documentary editions have all been periodically removed from YouTube under policy enforcement. Classified saves videos locally so you can build a case file that survives platform moderation.

Download on the App Store

The connections people make

Around the documented 9/11 case, a larger constellation of adjacent framings is maintained by the broader independent-research community. These are the arguments researchers bring into connection with the documented events. Whether the connections are load-bearing is the interpretive question.

The PNAC and Rebuilding America's Defenses framing. The Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a neoconservative think tank active 1997–2006 whose co-founders included William Kristol, Robert Kagan, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, and Richard Perle, published a September 2000 policy document titled Rebuilding America's Defenses. The document contained the widely-cited line stating that the process of transformation of US defense posture "is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor." Theologian David Ray Griffin's 2004 book The New Pearl Harbor was named for this line and remains the most comprehensive academic-style catalog of 9/11 inside-job arguments. Believers argue the line is load-bearing evidence of intent; skeptics argue it is a forecasting observation rather than an advocacy of engineering the event.

The Saudi-US relationship and the 28 pages. The 2016 release of the 28 pages and the 2021 declassification of Operation Encore have substantially strengthened the Saudi-connection framing within mainstream research. Prince Bandar bin Sultan — Saudi Ambassador to the US 1983–2005, director of Saudi intelligence 2012–14, and nicknamed "Bandar Bush" for his closeness to the Bush family — is a central figure in the documentary record. The In re Terrorist Attacks civil suit, brought by nearly 10,000 9/11 victims and survivors against Saudi Arabia under JASTA, has produced substantial discovery through 2024–26 including additional Omar al-Bayoumi documents. The ongoing legal record is the most active current channel of the broader inside-job research.

Peter Dale Scott and the deep state framework. UC Berkeley professor emeritus Peter Dale Scott's The Road to 9/11: Wealth, Empire, and the Future of America (2007) and his subsequent work articulated the "deep state" framework — borrowed from Turkish political analysis — for interpreting 9/11 and subsequent US foreign policy. Scott's work is among the most academically credentialed of the inside-job-adjacent analyses and is cited across multiple research communities. His argument centers on the intersection of drug-economy financial flows, intelligence-service operations, and political-coup infrastructure that he traces back to the 1963 Kennedy assassination.

The Loose Change documentary series. Dylan Avery's Loose Change (initial release 2005, multiple subsequent editions through Loose Change: Final Cut in 2007 and Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup in 2009) is the single most-watched 9/11 inside-job documentary. It was the document that brought the inside-job framing to mainstream youth audiences in the mid-2000s. Its critical reception has been mixed — mainstream debunking has focused on specific factual errors, while independent researchers have argued its core arguments survive those corrections. The documentary's influence on the broader public conversation is not in dispute.

Kean and Hamilton's "Without Precedent." The 9/11 Commission's own chair and vice-chair — Thomas Kean (former Governor of New Jersey) and Lee Hamilton (former Congressman from Indiana) — published a joint 2006 book, Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission, in which they stated that they believed they had been lied to by NORAD and the FAA during the investigation. Commissioner Max Cleland resigned in December 2003 citing document-access refusals and later described the Commission's work as "scammed." Commissioner John Lehman (former Secretary of the Navy) has stated publicly that he believes aspects of the Saudi connection were insufficiently investigated. The Commission's own members' public statements are themselves among the most authoritative sources for the argument that the official investigation was incomplete.

Key voices

  • Richard Gage, AIA — architect; founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth, 2006); the organization now has more than 3,500 architecture and engineering signatories.
  • David Ray Griffin (1939–2022) — theologian and philosopher; author of The New Pearl Harbor (2004) and 10 subsequent 9/11 books; the most comprehensive academic-style 9/11 research catalog.
  • Steven E. Jones — former BYU physics professor; co-author of the 2009 Harrit et al. nanothermite paper; lost his academic position after his 9/11 research.
  • Kevin Ryan — former Underwriters Laboratories fire-safety manager; fired after publicly questioning NIST's WTC investigation conclusions; co-author of multiple peer-reviewed 9/11 papers.
  • Nafeez Ahmed — investigative journalist; The War on Truth (2005) focused on the Pakistan/Saudi dimension; ongoing reporting on intelligence-service connections.
  • Peter Dale Scott — UC Berkeley professor emeritus; author of The Road to 9/11 (2007); articulator of the "deep state" analytical framework.
  • Christopher Bollyn — independent journalist; extensive work on the Dancing Israelis and related allied-state framings.
  • Danny Jowenko (1954–2011) — Dutch controlled-demolition expert; his 2007 Zembla interview on WTC 7 is the most-cited single testimony by a demolition professional on the inside-job side; died in single-car accident July 16, 2011.
  • Leroy Hulsey, PhD — University of Alaska Fairbanks; lead investigator of the 2020 WTC 7 structural re-evaluation study.
  • Niels H. Harrit, PhD — retired University of Copenhagen chemist; lead author of the 2009 nanothermite paper.
  • Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton — chair and vice-chair of the 9/11 Commission; co-authored Without Precedent (2006), acknowledging the Commission had been lied to by NORAD and FAA.
  • Dylan Avery — director of the Loose Change documentary series (2005–2009), the most widely distributed 9/11 inside-job documentary.
  • Barbara Honegger — author of The Pentagon Attack Papers; advances the Pentagon-specific framing within the MIHOP umbrella.
  • Dr. Judy Wood — author of Where Did the Towers Go? (2010); advances a directed-energy-weapon (DEW) hypothesis; contested within 9/11 research itself.
  • FDNY firefighters — collectively, via the 2005-released oral histories, the single largest primary-source witness archive.

For related material, see our coverage of Operation Northwoods (the documented 1962 JCS false-flag planning document that became a core reference in post-9/11 independent research), the 2026 US strikes on Iran (which researchers argue completes Wesley Clark's "seven countries in five years" list that originated in the post-9/11 environment), and Bohemian Grove.

The official position

The 9/11 Commission Report (July 22, 2004) and subsequent NIST investigations (NCSTAR 1 for the Twin Towers, September 2005; NCSTAR 1A for WTC 7, August 2008) hold that the attacks were planned and executed by al-Qaeda under Osama bin Laden, that 19 hijackers operationalized the attacks, that the Twin Towers collapsed due to aircraft impact damage and subsequent fire, and that WTC 7 collapsed due to thermal expansion of girders caused by office fires. The Commission's final report declined to investigate several specific questions raised during hearings. The US has never charged any US or allied-state actor with involvement beyond al-Qaeda and the hijackers. Bin Laden was killed by US Navy SEALs in Abbottabad, Pakistan on May 2, 2011. The 28 redacted pages of the Congressional Joint Inquiry, released on July 15, 2016, detailed connections between the hijackers and Saudi government figures but did not result in formal charges. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed remains at Guantanamo Bay with military-commission proceedings ongoing. The civil case In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 (S.D.N.Y.) continues in discovery through 2026.

Where it is now

Twenty-five years after the attacks, the 9/11 questions remain substantially active in independent research. The May 2023 federal subpoena of the Saudi government regarding 9/11-related information has produced additional document releases. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth continues to maintain its membership and publish structural analysis. The University of Alaska Fairbanks 2020 Hulsey Report — a four-year computer simulation of WTC 7's collapse — concluded that fire could not have caused the collapse, directly contradicting NIST's 2008 finding, and has not been formally responded to by NIST. Operation Encore declassification continues in phases through 2022–2026 under Executive Order 14040. The In re Terrorist Attacks SDNY civil litigation has produced discovery that independent researchers continue to work through. The 2016 JASTA legislation remains the legal architecture under which the Saudi-connection questions are being pursued. Calls for a new federal 9/11 investigation continue, without formal federal response. The shift over the past decade — from the 2005–10 era of documentary-driven public debate to the 2020s era of slow, primary-source document analysis — has been the defining feature of 9/11 research in its third decade.

Go deeper

Primary and secondary sources

  • National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, The 9/11 Commission Report (July 22, 2004)
  • NIST, Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers (NCSTAR 1, September 2005)
  • NIST, Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (NCSTAR 1A, August 2008)
  • J. Leroy Hulsey, Zhili Quan, Feng Xiao, A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 (University of Alaska Fairbanks, March 2020)
  • Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones et al., "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" (Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009)
  • Congressional Joint Inquiry, The 28 Pages (released July 15, 2016)
  • FBI Operation Encore declassification (released beginning September 11, 2021 under Executive Order 14040)
  • FDNY Oral Histories — 12,000 pages, released August 2005, nytimes.com archive
  • Jane Standley / BBC World broadcast, September 11, 2001 4:57 PM ET — preserved off-air copies
  • Larry Silverstein, PBS America Rebuilds (September 2002) — "pull it" interview
  • Danny Jowenko, Zembla documentary interview (2007)
  • Netanyahu 2008 settler-meeting recording (released 2010)
  • David Ray Griffin, The New Pearl Harbor (2004); The New Pearl Harbor Revisited (2008)
  • Peter Dale Scott, The Road to 9/11: Wealth, Empire, and the Future of America (2007)
  • Thomas Kean & Lee Hamilton, Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission (2006)
  • Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth — ae911truth.org
  • Dylan Avery, Loose Change (2005, 2006, 2007 Final Cut, 2009 American Coup)
  • Project for the New American Century, Rebuilding America's Defenses (September 2000)
  • In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 (S.D.N.Y. MDL 1570) — civil litigation filings 2003–2026
BUILD YOUR CASE

Your investigation, organized.

Classified is a private, offline research notebook for independent investigators. Save videos from any platform. Organize arguments and sources into cases. Rate credibility. Present your findings. Everything stays on your iPhone — no account, no cloud, no tracking.

Download on the App Store

Frequently asked questions

What is the 9/11 inside job theory?

The umbrella theory that elements of the US government — or of allied governments — had advance knowledge of, facilitated, or orchestrated the 9/11 attacks beyond the 9/11 Commission account. Specific framings branch into LIHOP, MIHOP, allied-state (Saudi and Israeli), and controlled-demolition variants. Anchors include Building 7, the Silverstein lease, Operation Encore, the 28 pages, and the 2020 Hulsey study.

Why did Building 7 collapse on 9/11?

WTC 7 collapsed at 5:20 PM on September 11, 2001 — seven hours after the Twin Towers, without being hit by any aircraft. NIST's August 2008 final report (NCSTAR 1A) attributes the collapse to fire-induced thermal expansion. AE911Truth and the 2020 UAF Hulsey study argue the collapse characteristics — including a period of free-fall acceleration — are incompatible with fire alone and require near-simultaneous column failure consistent with controlled demolition.

What did Larry Silverstein mean by "pull it"?

On the 2002 PBS "America Rebuilds" documentary, Silverstein described a call with a fire commander and said "maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." Silverstein has clarified he meant "pull the firefighters." Dutch demolition expert Danny Jowenko stated in the 2007 Zembla interview that WTC 7's collapse was "clearly a controlled demolition." Jowenko died in a single-car accident on July 16, 2011.

When did Larry Silverstein buy the World Trade Center?

July 24, 2001 — 48 days before September 11. A $3.2 billion 99-year lease with $3.55 billion per-occurrence terrorism insurance. Silverstein won a $4.55 billion settlement in 2007 by arguing the two impacts were separate events. His wife scheduled his dermatology appointment that morning; he typically breakfasted at Windows on the World.

Who are the Dancing Israelis?

Five Israeli men — employees of Urban Moving Systems, owner Dominik Suter — arrested September 11, 2001 after being seen filming and celebrating the WTC attacks from New Jersey. Urban Moving Systems was reportedly assessed by the FBI as a Mossad front. Detained approximately two months, deported to Israel without charges. One later said on Israeli TV: "Our purpose was to document the event."

What is Operation Encore?

The FBI's 2007–2016 sub-investigation into Saudi government connections to the 9/11 hijackers. Under Executive Order 14040 (September 3, 2021), the Biden administration directed declassification. First Encore documents released September 11, 2021. Focus: Omar al-Bayoumi (Saudi intelligence officer who aided hijackers al-Hazmi and Hanjour in San Diego 1999-2000), Fahad al-Thumairy (Saudi consular official), Osama Bassnan. Records form part of the basis in the SDNY In re Terrorist Attacks civil suit.

What did the BBC report about Building 7?

At 4:57 PM on September 11, 2001, BBC World's Jane Standley reported WTC 7 had collapsed — 23 minutes before it actually did. Footage shows WTC 7 still standing in the background. The BBC acknowledged the early report and that the original broadcast master tape was subsequently lost. The segment remains the single most-cited visual data point in Building 7 research.

What did firefighters say about bombs on 9/11?

The 2005-released FDNY oral histories — 12,000 pages across 503 personnel, recorded late 2001 and early 2002 — contain dozens of firsthand accounts describing explosions, secondary blasts, and sounds consistent with demolition. Louie Cacchioli: "I think there were bombs set in the building." Patricia Ondrovic, Frank Cruthers, Stephen Gregory, and dozens of others describe similar observations.

Did the Simpsons predict 9/11?

The September 1997 episode "The City of New York vs. Homer Simpson" contains a pamphlet with "9" next to the Twin Towers that can be read as "9/11." Producers have described it as coincidence. The scene is authentic; the interpretation is contested.

What did Netanyahu say about 9/11?

In a 2008 recorded conversation with West Bank settlers, Netanyahu said: "We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon... [it] swung American public opinion in our favor." Released 2010. Authentic; the interpretation — strategic commentary or something more — is contested.